Young v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
HECHT, Justice.
We grant the State’s motion for rehearing and withdraw our prior opinion. The following is now our opinion.
Ralph Daniel Young pleaded guilty to two indictments each charging unlawful possession of a controlled substance, namely, amphetamine and LSD. The trial court found Young guilty upon his pleas and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment on each charge. In a single point of error, Young complains that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the incriminating evidence against him seized by authority of a search warrant which Young argues was issued…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cassias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Marquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Heitman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Muniz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.