Legal Opinion
ForSaleByOwner. Com Corp. v. Zinnemann
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 18, 2004No. CIV. S 03-1019MCEGGHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ENGLAND, District Judge.
In bringing the present action, Plaintiff ForSaleByOwner.com 1 (hereinafter “FSBO”) challenges the State of California’s real estate licensing requirements, as codified in California Business and Professions Code §§ 10000 et seq., on constitutional grounds. Specifically, FSBO seeks judicial determination that those licensing requirements, as enforced by Defendants Paula Reddish Zinnemann, Commissioner of the California Department of Real Estate, and Defendant Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California (hereinafter “Defendants”)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lan Lan Wang v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Leslie Rae Young v. Pete RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Gruwell v. Department of Financial & Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Gruwell v. Department of Financial & Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Gruwell v. The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.