Legal Opinion
Schoene v. Rasmussen
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 14, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01151Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KIMBERLY M. SCHOENE, No. 3:23-cv-01151-HZ Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. CARRIE RASMUSSEN, in her official capacity as District Attorney of Hood River County; ANTHONY FRASIER, in his official capacity as Detective of City of Hood River Police Department; HOOD RIVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, an agency of the County of Hood River; COUNTY OF HOOD RIVER, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon; CITY OF HOOD RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, an agency of the City of Hood River; and CITY OF HOOD RIVER, a municipal corporation,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.