Legal Opinion
State v. Bates
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2018No. 51,890–KAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The defendant, Jamarcus M. Bates, was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of La. R.S. 14:95.1. After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Bates entered a Crosby plea agreement with the state in which he agreed to plead guilty to the responsive charge of attempted possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in exchange for a sentence of seven years at hard labor to run concurrently with a separate seven-year sentence on an unrelated conviction. Bates also received credit for time served and reserved the right to seek review of the trial court's…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Brynton Kelli SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Jermon JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph W. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Raymond George JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.