Doyle v. Callaghan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The allegations of the complaint are to the effect that one Casserly deposited certain stocks with the defendants for safe-keeping, and authorized them to receive the dividends and pay the assessments thereon. Afterwards he duly demanded the stocks and the defendants refused to deliver them to him. After that he was induced by their false and fraudu*155lent representations to execute and deliver to them a release in-writing of all his claims and demands against them. Subsequently he assigned said stocks and all his claims and demands against the defendants “growing out of the said fraudulent…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Arzaga v. VillalbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- King Iron Bridge & Manuf'g Co. v. County of OtoeUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
- Tafft v. Presidio & Ferries Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1889