Legal Opinion · Dissent

Color-Ad Packaging, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 16, 1988No. C8-87-2103Published

1DissentKelley, Justice

When construing a statute, a court’s function is to ascertain and effectuate legislative intention. In pursuit of that goal a court is not free to disregard the letter of the law when the wording of the statute is clear and free from all ambiguity. However, as a corollary to that rule, when the words of the law are not explicit, or where ambiguity exists, courts must attempt to ascertain the intention of the legislature by the application of certain statutory criteria. See Minn.Stat. § 645.16 (1986). Likewise, courts are authorized to employ certain presumptions in ascertaining that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Trust Co. v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. The First National Bank & Trust Company of Chickasha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Ramaley v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Community Telecasting Service v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API