Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1988No. 53483PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Movant appeals following the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.

Movant sought post-conviction relief under Rule 27.26 after pleading guilty to the charges of assault with intent to do great bodily harm, escape from custody, second degree assault, and illegal sale of a controlled substance. The motion court concluded movant’s motion stated no claim for relief under Rule 27.26 and thus that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary.

On appeal movant contends the motion court erred in denying an evidentiary hearing on movant’s Rule 27.26 motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Bailey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Campbell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bagby v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API