Brown v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Judge.
Movant appeals following the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.
Movant sought post-conviction relief under Rule 27.26 after pleading guilty to the charges of assault with intent to do great bodily harm, escape from custody, second degree assault, and illegal sale of a controlled substance. The motion court concluded movant’s motion stated no claim for relief under Rule 27.26 and thus that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary.
On appeal movant contends the motion court erred in denying an evidentiary hearing on movant’s Rule 27.26 motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chapman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bailey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Campbell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bagby v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990