Commonwealth v. Kunish
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT, Justice.
In this appeal we must resolve the question of whether the trial court violated the double jeopardy clause when, after sentencing the appellee to a term of two and one-half to five years of incarceration, the court recalled the appellee and resentenced him for the same criminal offense to a term of three and one-half to seven years of incarceration. The double jeopardy clause set forth in the Pennsylvania Constitution is coextensive with federal constitutional standards.1 Commonwealth v. Sojourner, 513 Pa. 36, 518 A.2d 1145 (1986).
The facts of this case are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. FusselmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. FoustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. VasquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.