Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 1996No. 87660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Roberts v. State, 677 So.2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), in which the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

IF THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSES A SPLIT SENTENCE, MAY THE INCAR-CERATIVE PORTION. OF THE SENTENCE DEVIATE MORE THAN 25 PERCENT FROM THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES PRISON SENTENCE IF THE TRIAL COURT ■OTHERWISE COMPLIES WITH THE APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES IN IMPOSING THE DEPARTURE SENTENCE?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed, we an*1278swer the question in the affirmative and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Acosta v. RichterSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. State v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. State v. WaldoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Ramroop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API