Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Walthal

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 12, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

— This case is again before us for consideration upon the relators’ further attack upon the amended and further return of the respondents filed pursuant to the opinion and order of this Court entered July 21, 1936. See State, ex rel. Gillespie, v. Walthall, 124 Fla. 866, 169 So. Rep. 552.

The object of the present proceeding, as shown by the former opinion, is simply to require the levy of a tax for the interest and sinking fund requirements of the City of Winter Haven’s refunding bonds only to the extent that such tax would have been leviable and collectible for the satisfaction of the bonds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. County of HillsboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. WalthallSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & SonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Conn v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Fahs v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Olds v. AlvordSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Adams v. SaundersSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API