Legal Opinion

Fahs v. Kilgore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

— This suit was brought to enjoin.the City of Leesburg, Florida, from paying further interest on the several classes of refunding bonds of the City,-¡from' funds on hand derived-from tax levies authorized for that purpose. An appeal was taken from a decree granting an-injunction and denying a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint: It is - in effect contended by the appellee that the refunding bonds in the hands of purchasers are invalid,, mainly on the ground that the-several different classes of bonds that were refunded, were issued at different times when the city boundaries embraced…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. State v. County of CitrusSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & SonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Rountree v. State Ex Rel. Georgia Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & SonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Mutual Loan & Savings Co. Of West Palm Beach, Fla. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  4. Town of Largo v. RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API