Legal Opinion
People v. McKown
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 2007No. 102372PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.
OPINION
At issue in this case is whether the trial court properly admitted testimony regarding the results of a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test 1 at defendant Joanne McKown’s trial for driving under the influence of alcohol. Over objection, the trial court admitted the testimony of the arresting officer regarding the administration and results of an HGN test performed on defendant without first holding an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Frye v. United States, 293 F.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. McKownIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Orr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Little v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. DiazAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.