Pierce v. Bank One-Franklin, NA
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Plaintiffs-Appellants, Stanley K. Pierce and Garneda Pierce (Pierces), appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, Bank One-Franklin, NA (Bank) and David Bauer (Bauer). We affirm.
Issues
The Pierces raise several issues which we consolidate and restate as follows:
I. Whether a qualified privilege was properly assigned to the statements alleged to have been made by the Bank and Bauer.
II. Whether the trial court erroneously based its decision on an affidavit alleged to be a deposition.
Facts and Procedural History
In 1984, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Chambers v. American Trans Air, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Keating v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Inland Steel v. PequignotIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Near East Side Community Organization v. HairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Filip v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Wayne Township Board of School Commissioners v. Indiana Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- National Board of Examiners for Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. American Osteopathic Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Superior Federal Bank v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Hammock v. Red Gold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.