Legal Opinion
Perez v. New York Telephone Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered on May 19, 1989 and January 17, 1990, the first granting motions for summary judgment by the defendants New York Telephone Company (NYTel) and Rohm & Haas (R&H) dismissing the complaint, counterclaims and cross claims against them, and the second granting the motion of defendant Acoustic Development Co. (ADC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, counterclaims and cross claims against it, are unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On February 17, 1985, the plaintiff Jose Perez, then an infant, sustained a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Boltax v. Joy Day CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Indig v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Mack v. Altmans Stage Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Danielenko v. Kinney Rent a Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Healey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- DiGiovanni v. RauschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Seda v. Port Authority of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Garcia v. Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club/Youth Activities Committee, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999