Legal Opinion
Seda v. Port Authority of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.) entered September 22, 2005, which granted the motion by defendants Port Authority and Koch Skanska for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s claims based on New York’s Labor Law were properly dismissed as inapplicable since they are conduct-regulating, and New Jersey, where the accident occurred, has the greater interest in regulating behavior within its borders (see Padula v Lilarn Props. Corp., 84 NY2d 519, 522 [1994]; Florio v Fisher Dev., 309 AD2d 694, 696…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cruz-Mendez v. ISU/Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Smith v. Keller Ladder Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Lynch v. Galler Seven-Up Pre-Mix Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Florio v. Fisher Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramirez-Gomez v. Empire Today, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025