Legal Opinion
In Re Jordan
California Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1972No. Docket Nos. Crim. 15734, 15755PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Petitioners Robert Charles Jordan, Jr., an inmate at California Men’s Colony at San Luis Obispo 1 convicted of violating Penal Code sections 207 (kidnaping), and 286 (sodomy), and Eugene Grady, an inmate at San Quentin Prison convicted of violating Penal Code section 47.0 (forgery), seek habeas corpus to 1 challenge two Department of Corrections rules, Director’s Rules 2404 and 2406, forbidding confidential correspondence by an inmate with his attorney. (Neither petitioner challenges the validity of his conviction.) Both petitions raise the same issues.
It is a well…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Landman v. RoysterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- Jones v. WittenbergDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971
- Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
- In Re HarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Joseph Taylor v. W. L. SterrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Jacquelin Davis v. O'Melveny & Myers, a California Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.