Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Pennsylvania State Police of Com.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2009No. 40 MAP 2007 and 46 MAP 2007PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this direct appeal, we consider, inter alia, whether Appellant/Cross-Appellee Pennsylvania State Police (“State Police”) has standing to challenge, via preliminary objections raised in a mandamus action, the merits of a trial court’s order requiring the expungement of a criminal record pursuant to the Criminal History Record Information Act (“CHRIA or ‘Act’ ’’).1 For the reasons that follow, we find the State Police lacks standing, and, thus, affirm in part the order of the Commonwealth Court. As described below, we also remand the matter for further proceedings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. MotoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Driscoll v. CorbettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API