Nott v. Beightel
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action to quiet title to real estate and to enjoin defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s use and possession of certain personal property located thereon. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
The real estate in question is two town lots in Holton. After alleging the residence of the parties, the petition alleged that plaintiff was the owner of the two lots, including all buildings and machinery located on them; that he by and through his immediate predecessors in title had been continuously in open, notorious and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Watkins v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Danielson v. WoestemeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Midstate Oil Co. v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Chamberlain v. Northeastern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HumbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Gauger v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Schoenberger v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.