Legal Opinion

Manley v. Connolly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1923No. 23,379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages suffered as the result of a collision between his automobile and defendant’s motor truck. The complaint charged defendant with negligence in the management and operation of its truck. The answer denied negligence and charged plaintiff with contributory negligence. The trial resulted in a verdict for defendant and plaintiff has appealed from the denial of his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff is not represented on this appeal by the counsel who tried his case, but by new counsel.

One of the assignments of error goes to the sufficiency of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Esterly-Hoppin Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eichhorn v. LundinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Kern v. Art Schimkat Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Desforge v. City of West St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance v. OverholserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API