Legal Opinion
Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Tidwell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2009No. 07-8083PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioners-Appellants Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Jackson Hole Conserva-
tion Alliance, and Wyoming Outdoor Council (collectively “GYC”) sent a letter to the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) and the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) requesting the agencies to undertake environmental analyses of Wyoming elk feedgrounds located on federal land. In the letter, GYC alleged the environmental analyses were required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321^4370. Unsatisfied with the agencies’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Wildearth Guardians v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Scarborough Citizens Protecting Resources v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Western Organization of Resource Councils v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.