In re the Detention of Black
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
¶1 Mark Black challenges his commitment as a sexually violent predator under chapter 71.09 RCW. He contends that his commitment must be vacated because he was not present when some potential jurors were questioned individually in open court about their prior experiences with sexual abuse. Based on the record before us, we conclude Black waived his right to be present while jurors were individually questioned about these sensitive subjects. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Facts
¶2 In 2004,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilmore v. Jefferson County Pub. Transp. Benefit AreaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Fred Cantrell, Jr., Et Ux v. Samuel ValdezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Gilmore v. Jefferson County Pub. Transp. Benefit AreaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Black (In Re Black)Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Black (In Re Black)Washington Supreme Court · 2018