Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Black (In Re Black)

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2018No. 94494-6Published

1Dissent

MADSEN, J. (dissenting)

¶ 32 Relying on the fact that "paraphilia not otherwise specified (NOS)" is generally an accepted diagnosis within the psychological community, the majority holds that the trial court properly admitted the State's expert testimony on "paraphilia NOS, persistent sexual interest in pubescent aged females." Majority at 884-85, 886-87. The problem, however, is that despite the paraphilia NOS label, the specifically identified condition substantially mirrors a diagnosis identified under another name-hebephilia-that is controversial within the same scientific community.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API