Legal Opinion

United States v. Nagel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 24, 2009No. 08-2535PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPALA, District Judge.

Michael E. Nagel, pled guilty to attempting to entice a minor to engage in a criminal sexual act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) and was sentenced to the mandatory minimum ten-year term of imprisonment. On appeal, argues that the mandatory minimum sentence violates the Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution because it is not subject to a “safety valve” allowing for a sentence below the mandatory minimum term. We affirm.

I. Background

By indictment, the government charged that defendant violated § 2422(b) when he:

used a facility and means of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. BrueggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Council 31 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. ReingoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API