Jarosz v. Union Products, Inc.

Plaintiff James Jarosz (“Jarosz”) seeks an order from this Court striking defendant Union Products, Inc.’s responses to Jarosz’s document requests nos. 1 through 4, and compelling further responses. Defendant Union Products, Inc. (“UPI”) opposes the motion, arguing that all responsive, non-privileged documents have been produced and asserting attorney/client privilege.2

For the following reasons, Jarosz’s motion is DENIED.

DISCUSSION

The facts of this case have been set out before, and need not be repeated here.3 The present motion revolves around Jarosz’s request for production of documents and…