Legal Opinion
United States v. Peelle
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 4, 1958No. Civ. A. 16381PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ABRUZZO, District Judge.
The United States of America in this action is seeking to foreclose liens for federal income taxes against the defendants. The action against Henry E. Peelle involves the sum of $1,583,856.04 and covers the years 1944 through 1949. The action against Inez Beatty Peelle involves the amount of $757,514.98 with interest and penalties. Inez Beatty Peelle and Henry E. Peelle filed joint returns for the years 1948 and 1949. The plaintiff, in addition to the fixing of taxes against Inez Beatty Peelle for 1948 and 1949, due to the joint returns, 'seeks a judgment against her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commissioner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bryan Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Bryan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Williams v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kesling v. KeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mickam v. Joseph Louis Palace TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Estate of Maceo v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1964
- Andrew C. Kesling, individually and as Trustee of the Andrew C. Kesling Trust v. Peter C. KeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.