Thurmond v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BBC OKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. Appellant’s first assignment complains that the court erred in admitting in evidence, over appellant’s objection, a purported conversation between appellant and Joe Watkins, as testified by Joe Watkins, alleged to have occurred on, the day before the alleged burglary; and while appellant and said Watkins were coming from Fort Worth to Dallas, to the effect that appellant told witness Watkins that he (appellant) had followed the business of stealing chickens, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crenshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Ex Parte GreenhawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Wadkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Fruger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.