McDowell Bk. of Sharon v. Rosenblum
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
This is an appeal by a defendant from the order of the court below refusing to open a confessed judgment and let him into a defense. The order will be affirmed.
The facts are somewhat complicated but may be stated as follows:
McDowell National Bank, the legal plaintiff, lent the defendant $6,000, — which he used for his own purposes — , and took his judgment note therefor. The note was guaranteed by four men, who composed the firm of Nathan Rosenblum & Co. On April 4, 1931, when the principal of the note had been reduced to $4,600, the guarantors paid this amount, took…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baraonfski v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952