Legal Opinion

McDowell Bk. of Sharon v. Rosenblum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1938No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This is an appeal by a defendant from the order of the court below refusing to open a confessed judgment and let him into a defense. The order will be affirmed.

The facts are somewhat complicated but may be stated as follows:

McDowell National Bank, the legal plaintiff, lent the defendant $6,000, — which he used for his own purposes — , and took his judgment note therefor. The note was guaranteed by four men, who composed the firm of Nathan Rosenblum & Co. On April 4, 1931, when the principal of the note had been reduced to $4,600, the guarantors paid this amount, took…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baraonfski v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API