Legal Opinion

Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1984No. C5-83-1854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding damages to defendants on their counterclaim. Plaintiff claims there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding that plaintiff negligently performed its excavation contract and that the trial court erred in finding defendants third party beneficiaries to plaintiff’s contract with a township. We affirm.

FACTS

The three contracts

On April 3, 1978 defendant Parrante Builders and White Bear Township entered a “development agreement” for a plat of land known as Halper’s First Addition. White Bear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the U. of M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. McCree & Company v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chard Realty, Inc. v. City of ShakopeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Gold'n Plump Poultry, Inc. v. Simmons Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. 614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API