Legal Opinion

City of Baton Rouge v. Knox

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1997No. Nos. 95-KA-2850, 95-KA-3042PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

| iCALOGERO, Chief Justice.

In two separate proceedings below, the trial courts declared Baton Rouge Code of Ordinance, Title 13:1019, entitled “Drug Paraphernalia Prohibited”, to be preempted by state law under La. R.S. 14:143, a statute which prohibits a political subdivision from enacting an ordinance defining as an offense conduct that is defined and punishable as a felony under state law. One of the trial courts also ruled that the Baton Rouge ordinance was unconstitutional. Because we agree that the city ordinance violates La. R.S. 14:143 in that it defines and punishes as a misdemeanor…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. State v. SuireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. State v. FoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BridgewaterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API