Legal Opinion

State v. Foy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 1981No. 80-K-1814PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

401 So.2d 948 (1981)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Carl Ray FOY and Arthur Berry.

No. 80-K-1814.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 26, 1981.

Dissenting Opinion January 30, 1981.

On Rehearing July 2, 1981.

Raymond L. Cannon, Indigent Defender Program, Tallulah, for defendants-relators.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., James D. Caldwell, Dist. Atty., Crawford A. Rose, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiffs-respondents.

WATSON, Justice.

Defendants' application for supervisory writs was granted to consider their contention that this prosecution by the State places them twice in…

Also in this document: Dissent · Blanche; Dissent · Lemmon; Per curiam; Concurrence; Dissent · Lemmon.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. State v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. State v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Salaz v. TansyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1989
  5. Bush Ex Rel. State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API