Legal Opinion
In re Hancock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) served a petition dated July 31, 2006, upon the respondent and corespondent Sheldon H. Kronegold containing 10 charges of professional misconduct. All of the charges em'anate from a common set of factual allegations. Charges one through four relate only to former corespondent Kronegold. Charges five through nine relate only to the respondent. Charge ten relates to both the respondent and Kronegold. Those portions of the charges as relate to Kronegold will not be…
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elfgeeh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical GroupDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Matter of FriedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of FriedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- In Re HancockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009