State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The trial court did not err by admitting a demonstration when the State established the relevancy of the demonstration with a proper foundation. Prosecutors are permitted in closing argument to point out the lack of evidence supporting the forecast of evidence made by defendant’s counsel in opening statement. The State’s argument that certain issues were not contained in the trial court’s instructions was not a comment upon defendant’s decision not to testify. Under the North Carolina Structured Sentencing Act, the decision not to hold a separate proceeding for aggravating…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Therchik v. Grant Aviation, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. NanesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. OglesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014