Legal Opinion
Voyles v. City of Nampa
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1976No. 11764PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Chief Justice.
Allen E. Voyles, the appellant, brought this action before the district court on a writ of habeas corpus after his arrest for an alleged violation of Nampa City Code § 6-1-27, which provides:
“Any person who shall be drunk or intoxicated in a private motor vehicle while said vehicle is located upon any public or private road or street or upon any other place to which the public has, or is permitted to have access, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. A ‘public place’ as defined in this Section, includes any place, building, or conveyance, to which the public has, or is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SmootIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Gonzales v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. BittIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.