Legal Opinion

State v. Lumsden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1988No. 88-0042-M; CA A47892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, «J.

Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. He assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the stop of his truck, arguing that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop him. We reverse.

Defendant had accompanied Candice Camp to the home of her sister, where Camp intended to retrieve some clothing. The sisters got into an argument, and Camp’s sister called the police. When Officer Schlegal arrived, defendant was sitting on the front porch. Camp was not in sight. Schlegal talked with Camp’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KolendarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. KolendarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API