Anderson v. Waco State Bank
Texas Supreme Court
Application for Writ of Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in a case appealed from McLennan County. The error complained of in the application is: “The court erred in holding that the endorsement of the notes herein sued on by Philip Alexandre gave the District Court of McLennan County jurisdiction over Gust Anderson, under his sworn plea of privilege to be sued in the ■county of his residence.” Alexandre, who was sued as endorser, resided in McLennan County.
1Opinion of the Court
STAYTON, Chief Justice.
Under the facts found there can not be any question as to the correctness of the conclusion on the jurisdictional matter on which applicant relies for writ of error; but it is deemed proper, in view of the fact that the Court of Civil Appeals, following the decision in the case of Berrendo Stock Company v. McCarty, 85 Texas, 412, held that there was no law in force in 1887 authorizing the forfeiture of school lands bought from the State otherwise than through the courts, to say, that in the decision of that case the attention of this court was not called to the Act…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Berrendo Stock Co. v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fristoe v. Leon & H. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Waggoner v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Waggoner v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kenedy Town & Improvement Co. v. First Nat. Bank of VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Leahy v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.