Legal Opinion
Waggoner v. Flack
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 23, 1903No. 28PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
188 U.S. 595 (1903)
WAGGONER
v.
FLACK.
No. 28.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 8, 1902.
Decided February 23, 1903.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.
Mr. W.W. Flood for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error but Mr. C.K. Bell, attorney general of the State of Texas, and Mr. T.S. Reese filed a brief as to the rights of the State.
MR. JUSTICE, PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.
Referring to the facts in this case, it is seen that the question arising is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fristoe v. Leon & H. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Culbertson v. BlanchardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. StandeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Waggoner v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Anderson v. Waco State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Palm Beach Mobile Homes, Inc. v. StrongSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Mahood v. Bessemer Properties IncorporatedSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Kansas City S. Ry. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.