Legal Opinion

Sommers v. Borgmann

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 13, 1943No. 15,373PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

A proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Plaintiff in error Sommers was the employer, and plaintiff in error Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation was the insurer. Defendant in error Borgmann, the claimant, whose formal notice and claim was filed with defendant in error Industrial Commission July 14, 1942, alleged that December 23, 1941, in the course of his employment with Sommers, a horse belonging to her and whose care was entrusted to claimant, stepped on the large toe of his right foot, which culminated in infection of the entire foot. July 16, 1942, the Industrial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer & Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  2. Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. Industrial Commission v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  4. American Mining Co. v. ZupetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  5. Ontario Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API