Trustees of the Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Nordstrom
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This ERISA contribution action is presently before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The parties have stipulated to the pertinent facts and exhibits and response briefs have been filed. Having reviewed and considered the parties’ motions and responses and the entire record of this matter, the Court has concluded that oral argument is not necessary. Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan Local…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Gerald JOHNSON, Bankrupt, CARLISLE CASHWAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald JOHNSON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Lopresti v. TerwilligerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trustees of Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund v. H.B. Stubbs Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Trustees of Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund v. H.B. Stubbs Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Trustees of Ohio Bricklayers Health and Welfare Fund v. Masonry Contracting CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021