Legal Opinion

Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 21, 1994No. Court No. 93-10-00691PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Musgrave, Judge:

Plaintiffs paid harbor fees in accordance with Customs’ interpretation of the Harbor Maintenance Revenue Act. 26 U.S.C. §§ 4461-62. Plaintiffs claim such payments were in excess of the amounts required by the law and accordingly seek a refund of claimed overpayments. Plaintiff HAL Antillen, N.V challenges Customs’ denial of its protest concerning harbor fees which Customs assessed because of *1021HAL Antillen’s alleged underpayment of such fees. Defendant argues that this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear these claims. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Detroit Zoological Society v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Shoe Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  2. Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. United States Shoe Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API