Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Musgrave, Judge:
Plaintiffs paid harbor fees in accordance with Customs’ interpretation of the Harbor Maintenance Revenue Act. 26 U.S.C. §§ 4461-62. Plaintiffs claim such payments were in excess of the amounts required by the law and accordingly seek a refund of claimed overpayments. Plaintiff HAL Antillen, N.V challenges Customs’ denial of its protest concerning harbor fees which Customs assessed because of *1021HAL Antillen’s alleged underpayment of such fees. Defendant argues that this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear these claims. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Detroit Zoological Society v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Shoe Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- United States Shoe Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.