Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Tanner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1949No. 16512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. The plaintiff’s petition in this case seeks by injunction to revise or modify the judgment of the trial court for partition of the common property by sale. This judgment was affirmed by this court in Lankford v. Milhollin, 200 Ga. 512 (37 S. E. 2d, 197); again in Lankford v. Milhollin, 201 Ga. 594 (40 S. E. 2d, 376); again in Lankford v. Milhollin, 202 Ga. 264 (42 S. E. 2d, 640); and the last reported affirmance appears in Lankford v. Milhollin, 203 Ga. 496 (47 S. E. 2d, 73). Obviously, as previously stated by this court, all questions now sought to be raised have either been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Lankford v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Henderson v. NapierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Lankford v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilman v. OsbornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API