Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Osborn

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1967No. 8370PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the trial court setting aside an earlier quiet title decree and quieting the title to an undivided mineral interest in the plaintiffs below.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

We will attempt to summarize the rather involved factual and legal situation: In 1928, one'Bates conveyed'the mineral'interest here involved to R. F. “Gillman”; the-deed Was recorded, and in 1957 was discovered in a safe which had belonged to R. F. “Gilman” b.y his widow some nineteen years after his death. In the intervening…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harwood v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American Spiritualist Ass'n v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Warfield v. Marks Marks v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Riddle v. JaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeanes v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Myers v. OlsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Santa Fe v. VelardeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Campos v. Brown Construction CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API