Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Katz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1962No. Crim. 7885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Harvey C. Katz and David Secon were accused by indictment of multiple violations of the Health and Safety Code. Count I accused Katz of forging a prescription for dihydrohydroxycodeinone (hereinafter referred to as percodan ) counts II, III, IV and V accused him of forging prescriptions for codeine; counts VI and X each accused Katz and Secón jointly of forging a prescription for percodan. Forging a prescription for a narcotic is made a crime by section 11715, Health and Safety Code.

Count XXII accused Katz and Secón jointly of selling percodan. The unlawful sale of a narcotic is made a crime…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Seiterle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Downs v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BunyardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. HeppleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. DENO CONSTANTINE KANARAS v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API