Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Crosswhite

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 2002No. C037863PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Defendant John Douglas Crosswhite appeals from an order extending his commitment to the state hospital pursuant to Penal Code section 1026.5, 1 which authorizes, under specified conditions, extended commitment of a person found not guilty of a felony by reason of insanity (§ 1026), beyond the maximum term of commitment to which the person could have been sentenced for the underlying offense. Defendant contends section 1026.5, subdivision (b)(8) violates his due process and equal protection rights by excluding time spent on outpatient status from the maximum term of commitment.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. HaynieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. BowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Hall v. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API