Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Haynie

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 2004No. F043306PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J.

Larry Darnell Haynie appeals from an order extending his commitment to a state hospital pursuant to Penal Code section 1026.5, 1 which authorizes extended commitment for treatment of a person found not guilty of a felony by reason of insanity (§ 1026). The sole issue raised is novel—whether the privilege against self-incrimination bars the prosecution from questioning Haynie about his mental state at the commitment extension hearing. We conclude that it does under the plain language of section 1026.5, subdivision (b)(7).

BACKGROUND

In 1989, Haynie was found not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cramer v. TyarsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. Superior Court (Williams)California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. PoggiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. DobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Hudec v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. AlsafarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API