Legal Opinion

Perkins County v. Keith County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1899No. 8833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Perkins county. Tried below before Grimes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The plaintiff the county of Keith, in its petition, alleged:

“1. That it was duly organized as a county in the year 1883; that its territory consisted of the territory now included in the county of Keith and the county of Perkins, the plaintiff and defendant in this action; that the county boundaries of the plaintiff county continued as above until on or about January 27, 1888, when the defendant county was duly organized and the officers of the defendant county assumed charge of its county government.
“2. That in accordance with section 16 of chapter 18 of the Compiled Statutes of Nebraska of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stringham v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Douglas County v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kemerer v. State ex rel. GarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Richardson County v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Fuller v. County of ColfaxNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. County of ClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. McCollough v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State ex rel. McDonald v. FarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Verges v. Morrill CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Crouch v. PyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API