Legal Opinion

John Q. Adams v. Denis Agniel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2005No. 04-2803PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

John Quincy Adams appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Adams, a Missouri inmate, was denied parole based on what he claims are erroneous factual determinations about his past drug and alcohol abuse. He sought damages and equitable relief in the form of corrections to his parole record. The district court dismissed Adams’s action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), interpreting the complaint as requesting early release, which could be obtained only through a petition for writ of habeas corpus. We conclude that the district court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Johnson v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. AgnielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API