Legal Opinion

Wininger v. SI Management L.P.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 24, 1998No. C 97-01622 CWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL AND DENYING RELATED MOTIONS AS MOOT

WILKEN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 58); (2) Pro posed Pro-Plan Intervenors’ motion to disqualify Plaintiffs counsel (Docket No. 134); (3) Plaintiffs related motions to strike exhibits submitted by Proposed Pro-Plan Interve-nors or, in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CSX Corp. v. Children's Investment Fund Management (UK) LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. Vestcom International, Inc. v. ChopraDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. In re Toronto-Dominion Bank / First Horizon Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API