Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. ZHA, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 6, 1995No. 93-1150-CIV-T-17CPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S RENEWED DISPOSITIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court in a Renewed Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant ZHA, Inc. (hereafter “ZHA” pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. No. 58). By its motion, ZHA seeks a ruling on two issues which this Court left open at the time of the July 18, 1994, ruling on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
This circuit clearly holds that summary judgment should only be entered when the moving party has sustained its burden…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- 32 Fair empl.prac.cas. 384, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,722 Donald A. Sweat, of the Will of Barbara C. Carlson v. Miller Brewing Company, a Wisconsin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Ramos v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1993