Legal Opinion

Morford v. Cattelan

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 6, 2022No. 1:21-cv-20039Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Joe Morford, Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-20039-Civ-Scola ) Maurizio Cattelan, Defendant. ) Order This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 49.) The pro se Plaintiff filed a response1 to the motion (ECF No. 50), and the Defendant filed a reply memorandum in support (ECF No. 53). After careful consideration of the briefing, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court denies the motion. (ECF No. 49.) 1. Background Can a banana taped to a wall be art? Must art be…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Pielage v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API