Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 8, 2009No. C 08-04599 CWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jeanne Rodgers moves for judgment on the administrative record on her claim for disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife), the California State Automobile Association Short-Term Disability Plan and the California State Automobile Association Long-Term Disability Plan cross-move for judgment on the administrative record. The matter was heard on July 16, 2009. Having…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cady v. Hartford Life & Accidental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013
- James v. AT & T West Disability Benefits ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Robertson v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- McHenry v. PACIFICSOURCE HEALTH PLANSDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Petrusich v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.